Your manuscript, reviewed by six AI specialists and a PhD scientist
A whole village reviews your manuscript in parallel. You get tracked changes in Word, margin comments, and a research report anticipating reviewer questions and flagging potential literature gaps.
Four steps to a stronger submission
Four steps, two days. The AI surfaces what gets overlooked, a scientist makes sure it matters.
Upload your manuscript
Drag and drop your .docx, tables, figures, and supplement. Tell us which journal you're targeting.
2 minutesSix AI reviewers go to work
Language, argumentation, compliance, consistency, literature, and science. Each does a deep dive into your manuscript.
Days of scrutiny, in hoursA PhD scientist reviews the review
A human scientist with domain expertise reads every finding. What's useful stays. What's noise gets cut.
Human-in-the-loopDeliverables in your inbox
A tracked-changes Word document you can accept or reject edit by edit, plus a research report on literature gaps and contradictions.
Within two business daysSix AI reviewers
Each reviewer does a deep, independent pass.
Language & Clarity
Grammar, word choice, sentence structure, and precision.
Argumentation & Logic
Logical flow, hypothesis clarity, evidence proportionality, and overclaimed conclusions.
Compliance & Format
Journal guidelines, CONSORT/STROBE checklists, word limits, and reference formatting.
Internal Consistency
Cross-checks every number across abstract, text, tables, and figures.
Literature Research
Missing references, citation verification, and anticipated reviewer questions.
Science & Data
Hypothesis generation from figures, claim verification, and alternative interpretations.
One manuscript, six AI reviewers, one scientist
The most systematic review your manuscript will get before submission.
- All 6 specialist AI reviewers
- Independent AI quality check
- Final review by a PhD scientist with research and scientific communication experience
- Tracked changes in Word (.docx)
- Margin comments where edits need context
- Research report on literature gaps and contradictions
- Tables & supplement included
- Two business day turnaround
We deliver the full review before you pay anything. If our edits don't make it into your manuscript, you owe nothing.
I expected language edits. I also got a rigorous analysis of numerical consistency, several anticipated reviewer questions, and a report highlighting potential literature gaps, all in under 12 hours.Prof. Dr. med. Richard Cathomas
Head of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Switzerland
Frequently asked
Yes. Your files are encrypted in transit and at rest. Only the AI review system and our reviewing scientist see your manuscript. We never use submissions for AI model training. We keep your files for up to one year so we can support follow-up reviews if you resubmit to a different venue, but will delete them immediately on request.
Original research articles, clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and case series in biomedical and clinical research. If you're unsure whether your manuscript fits, reach out and we'll let you know.
No. We review your manuscript the way a thorough peer reviewer would. Where a section can be sharpened, we may rewrite it rather than just flag the issue. But we don't ghostwrite, and every edit comes as a tracked change you can accept or reject.
You receive the full review first, no upfront payment. Once you let us know you're incorporating our edits, we send an invoice you can pay by credit card or bank transfer (SEPA/wire). If you don't use the review, you owe nothing.
Reply to the delivery email. We're happy to clarify findings or answer questions about any part of the review. Questions before getting started? Get in touch.
We're Jenny and Daniel, both PhDs, with industry experience at Roche and Google, married. We built Occam's Pen because we kept wishing it existed.
William of Ockham was a 14th-century Franciscan friar and philosopher famous for one idea: shave away unnecessary assumptions. His principle became known as Occam's Razor. After 700 years with a blade, we thought he deserved a pen.
Upload your manuscript
Upload your files and tell us what you need. We'll deliver the full review to your inbox within two business days.